Johnston v. Klopsch

88 F. 692, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2829
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJuly 7, 1898
DocketNo. 3,806
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 F. 692 (Johnston v. Klopsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Klopsch, 88 F. 692, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2829 (circtsdny 1898).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion is granted. Celluloid Mfg. Co. v. American Zylonite Co., 34 Fed. 744. The system of code pleading provides a method for “pleading the general .issue” which harmonizes with the other pleadings therein provided for, and which should be followed, since sections 4969 and 914, Rev. St., are to be construed together, and full effect given to both. An answer which contains a general denial of all the averments of the complaint, taken in connection with the provisions of section 4969, to the effect that defendant may, upon the trial, “give special matter in evidence,” secures all rights reserved to defendant under the federal statutes, without the incongruity of combining a code complaint with a common-law plea. Ten days from date of entry of order is given defendant to answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.
100 F. 77 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 F. 692, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-klopsch-circtsdny-1898.