Johnston v. Key

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Johnston v. Key

1925 OK 73, 235 P. 211, 110 Okla. 19, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 754

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1925

Docket15142

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1925 OK 73 (Johnston v. Key) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnston v. Key, 1925 OK 73, 235 P. 211, 110 Okla. 19, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 754 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

We have carefully read the entire testimony in this case and we think the findings of fact by the court are sustained by the testimony. We are not unmindful of the rule that in an equity case, and this is an equity- case purely, that this court has a right to review and weigh the evidence, and if the findings of the trial court are against the weight of the evidence, this court may reverse the findings and the judgment of the trial court. But the converse of this rule is equally controlling on this court; that is, if the findings of fact, and conclusions of law made by the trial court are not clearly against the weight of the evidence, this court will not disturb the .findings of the trial court. This rule is too well established by this cc urt to require the citations of authorities. After a careful reading of the testimony and findings of fact by the court, we are of the opinion that the judgment in this case is sustained 'by ithe weight of the evidence,' and controlled by the ease of Perry v. Shaver, 101 Okla. 248, 225 Pac. 359. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

By the Court: • It is so-- ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

We have carefully read the entire testimony in this case and we think the findings of fact by the court are sustained by the testimony. We are not unmindful of the rule that in an equity case, and this is an equity- case purely, that this court has a right to review and weigh the evidence, and if the findings of the trial court are against the weight of the evidence, this court may reverse the findings and the judgment of the trial court. But the converse of this rule is equally controlling on this court; that is, if the findings of fact, and conclusions of law made by the trial court are not clearly against the weight of the evidence, this court will not disturb the .findings of the trial court. This rule is too well established by this cc urt to require the citations of authorities. After a careful reading of the testimony and findings of fact by the court, we are of the opinion that the judgment in this case is sustained 'by ithe weight of the evidence,' and controlled by the ease of Perry v. Shaver, 101 Okla. 248, 225 Pac. 359. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

By the Court: • It is so-- ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK 73, 235 P. 211, 110 Okla. 19, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-key-okla-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack