Johnston v. Dopkins

6 Cal. 83
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

Where a referee is appointed merely to take an account between two parties, he bears simply the relation to the Court in which the ease is pending, of a master in chancery under the English system. His report stating the account may be excepted to, and the exceptions sustained, or overruled; but whatever may be the order of the Court upon them, sucl^ order is merely interlocutory, and is not the subject of appeal before final judgment or decree; after final decree, the action of the Court may be reviewed. This is a totally different case from that of a referee appointed, in the stead of the Court, to try and determine the cause.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnston v. Dopkins, 6 Cal. 83 (Cal. 1856).

6 Cal. 83 (Johnston v. Dopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellsworth v. Ellsworth
269 P.2d 3 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Baker v. Baker
10 Cal. 527 (California Supreme Court, 1858)