Johnston v. Dopkins
This text of 6 Cal. 83 (Johnston v. Dopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
Where a referee is appointed merely to take an account between two parties, he bears simply the relation to the Court in which the ease is pending, of a master in chancery under the English system. His report stating the account may be excepted to, and the exceptions sustained, or overruled; but whatever may be the order of the Court upon them, sucl^ order is merely interlocutory, and is not the subject of appeal before final judgment or decree; after final decree, the action of the Court may be reviewed. This is a totally different case from that of a referee appointed, in the stead of the Court, to try and determine the cause.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-dopkins-cal-1856.