Johnston v. Deaton

137 N.E. 10, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 41, 105 Ohio St. 285, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 313
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1922·No. No. 17182·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Epitomized Opinion

The plaintiff began action to partition of two 80 acre tracts of land between herself and defendant. The commissioners reported against division, and appraised each tract separately. The Common Pleas overruled plaintiff’s objection to the rule of the commissioners, and ordered the premises sold. The Court of Appeals held “no appeal lies from the order under consideration.” The Supreme Court held:

1. That it has recently decided, in 104 OS., 188, that the term “judgment” appearing in Sec. 6, Art. IV, Ohio Const., as amended in 1912, is no longer limited to the restricted meaning given it formerly by the legislature in 11582 GC., but it now comprehends all decrees and final orders rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction which determine the rights of the parties affected thereby.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnston v. Deaton, 137 N.E. 10, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 41, 105 Ohio St. 285, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 313 (Ohio 1922).

137 N.E. 10 (Johnston v. Deaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hack v. Keller
2015 Ohio 4128 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
Reel v. Reel
2013 Ohio 2624 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
Sellman v. Schaaf
244 N.E.2d 494 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1969)
Malone v. Malone
199 N.E.2d 405 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1963)
Queen City Savings & Loan Co. v. Foley
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1960)
Mitchell v. Crain
161 N.E.2d 80 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)
Beaver, Gdn. v. Bates
164 N.E.2d 429 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)
Zywiczynski v. Zywiczynski
58 N.E.2d 398 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1943)
Hackett v. Linch
103 P.2d 164 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1940)
Hersch v. Home Sav & Loan Co.
17 N.E.2d 377 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1938)