Johnston v. Compagne Navigazione Sota y Aznar

288 F. 847, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2243, 1923 A.M.C. 472
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 1923·No. No. 2031·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree in .the District Court was in favor of the owner of the steamship Unbe Mendi against the charterer for de-' murrage and damages for failure to perform its charter contract of June 14, 1920, to load the vessel with export coal to be carried at the price of $19 a ton. The findings of fact of the District Judge, having abundant support in the evidence, are not subject to review.

Careful consideration of the conclusions of law applicable to the facts convinces us that the decree of the District Court is correct. We think nothing of value can be added to the reasoning of the opinions found in Compagne Navigazione Sota y Agnar v. Diamond Fuel Co. (D. C.) 273 Fed. 299, and Hellenic Transport S. S. Co. v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co. (D. C.) 273 Fed. 290.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnston v. Compagne Navigazione Sota y Aznar, 288 F. 847, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2243, 1923 A.M.C. 472 (4th Cir. 1923).

288 F. 847 (Johnston v. Compagne Navigazione Sota y Aznar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Newton Bay
36 F.2d 729 (Second Circuit, 1929)