Johnston v. Columbian Insurance

7 Johns. 313
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proof of interest and loss were sufficient, in the first instance, to entitle the. plaintiff to recover. This is admitted by the act of the agent of the defendants, w'hich is binding on them; and the payment of the money into court was an admission qf the cause cf action, as alleged in the declaratien. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to judgment.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnston v. Columbian Insurance, 7 Johns. 313 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

7 Johns. 313 (Johnston v. Columbian Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parrott v. Colby
13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 55 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)