Johnston v. Bennett

5 Abb. Pr. 331
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Abb. Pr. 331 (Johnston v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Bennett, 5 Abb. Pr. 331 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1868).

Opinion

Jones, J.

—The principle laid down in Haight v. Hayt (19 N. Y., 464), controls this case ; and under it the demurrer must be overruled. The case of Haight v. Hayt proceeds, so far as the point involved in the case at bar is concerned, upon sections 1 and 2 of article 1 of title 3 of chapter 8 of part 3 of the revised statutes (See opinion of Grover, J., at p. 467, and of Denio, J., at p. 474).

When Zabriskie v. Smith (13 N. Y., 322) was decided, these provisions of the statute do not appear to have been called to the attention of the learned judge (Debio) who delivered the opinion.

Demurrer overruled with costs, with leave to defendants to withdraw demurrer .and answer within twenty days ; if not, then judgment for plaintiffs with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zabriskie v. . Smith
13 N.Y. 322 (New York Court of Appeals, 1855)
Haight v. . Hayt
19 N.Y. 464 (New York Court of Appeals, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Abb. Pr. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-bennett-nysuperctnyc-1868.