Johnston v. Acme Lithographing Co.
233 A.D. 667
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 233 A.D. 667 (Johnston v. Acme Lithographing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnston v. Acme Lithographing Co., 233 A.D. 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Determination affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Merrell, J., dissent on the ground that there was not sufficient proof on the part of plaintiff to sustain the recovery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-acme-lithographing-co-nyappdiv-1931.