Johnsons v. Anderson
3 N.J.L. 982
This text of 3 N.J.L. 982 (Johnsons v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnsons v. Anderson, 3 N.J.L. 982 (N.J. 1812).
Opinion
— There is no legal consideration on which the promise can attach. If this was law, usury and oppression would take a wide range. The creditor, in most cases, suffers an inconvenience in case of the want of púne[717]*717tuality in his debtor; he cannot, however, recover more than the debt, interest and costs; nor will a promise to pay more, help his case.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnsons-v-anderson-nj-1812.