Johnson's Ex'r v. Clark

4 Ark. 235
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Held, that, according to the act of the General Assembly regulating the practice of the Circuit Courts in cases in Chancery, a party is not entitled to an appeal, unless upon a final decision, order, or decree.

And that, where the drecree affirms that the conveyance of certain slaves is a mortgage, and that the complainant has a right to redeem under it, and directs the Master in Chancery to take an account, and make report to the next term of the Court; these facts clearly show that the decree is merely interlocutory, and not final or conclusive between the parties; and fhc appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson's Ex'r v. Clark, 4 Ark. 235 (Ark. 1842).

4 Ark. 235 (Johnson's Ex'r v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. Shriver
1921 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Davis v. Hale
170 S.W. 99 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)
Garner v. Prewitt
32 Ala. 13 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)