Johnson Vs. Horodesky (Child Custody)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AMBER JOHNSON, No. 82703 Appellant,
vs.
CHRISTOPHER M. HORODESKY, Respondent. FILED APR 1 6 2021 EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY S• t
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to modify custody. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rhonda Kay Forsberg, Judge.
The notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion has been formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Parra guirre
J.
Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A Ogiba.
- ti00)
, ''P.F7.7 ,7.7.7x
cc: Hon. Rhonda Kay Forsberg, District Judge Amber Johnson Fine Carman Price Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A 44b. 2 •• 7.
• L •,
;z•"*".:;:•• 7.1?-1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
483 P.3d 1121 (Johnson Vs. Horodesky (Child Custody)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.