Johnson Vs. Horodesky (Child Custody)
This text of 483 P.3d 1121 (Johnson Vs. Horodesky (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AMBER JOHNSON, No. 82703 Appellant, vs. CHRISTOPHER M. HORODESKY, Respondent. FILED APR 1 6 2021 EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY S• t DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to modify custody. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rhonda Kay Forsberg, Judge. The notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion has been formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Parra guirre
J. Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A Ogiba. - ti00) , ''P.F7.7 ,7.7.7x cc: Hon. Rhonda Kay Forsberg, District Judge Amber Johnson Fine Carman Price Eighth District Court Clerk
(0) I 947A 44b. 2 •• 7. • L •, ;z•"*".:;:•• 7.1?-1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 P.3d 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-vs-horodesky-child-custody-nev-2021.