Johnson v. Zuckerberg
This text of Johnson v. Zuckerberg (Johnson v. Zuckerberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TYLER D. JOHNSON, Case No. 23-cv-03910-AMO (PR)
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA 9 v. PAUPERIS; AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 10 MARK ZUCKERBERG, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 7 Defendants. 11
12 Plaintiff Tyler D. Johnson’s application for in forma pauperis status is GRANTED. The 13 total filing fee due is $350.00. Dkt. 2. The initial partial filing fee due for Johnson at this time is 14 $0.00. A copy of this Order and the attached instruction sheet will be sent to Johnson, the Prison 15 Trust Account Office and the Court’s Financial Office. 16 The Court will review Johnson’s complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, in a separate 17 written Order. 18 Also before the Court is Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. 7. There is no 19 constitutional right to counsel in a civil case unless an indigent litigant may lose his physical 20 liberty if he loses the litigation. See Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981); Rand 21 v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding that there is no constitutional right to 22 counsel in section 1983 action), withdrawn in part on other grounds on reh’g en banc, 154 F.3d 23 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). The court may ask counsel to represent an indigent litigant under 24 28 U.S.C. § 1915 only in “exceptional circumstances,” the determination of which requires an 25 evaluation of both (1) the likelihood of success on the merits, and (2) the ability of the plaintiff to 26 articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See id. at 1525; 27 Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1 a request for counsel under section 1915. See id. 2 Here, the Court is unable to assess at this time whether exceptional circumstances exist 3 which would warrant seeking volunteer counsel to accept a pro bono appointment. The 4 || proceedings are at an early stage, and it is premature for the Court to determine Johnson’s 5 likelihood of success on the merits. 6 Accordingly, the request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Dkt. 7 7. If, in the future, the Court concludes it is necessary to appoint counsel to represent Johnson, it 8 shall do so of its on volition. 9 This Order terminates Docket Nos. 2 and 7. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: January 2, 2024
| "| & 13 ( Mnacel Wed ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 14 United States District Judge
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3
4 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENT OF PRISONER’S FILING FEE
6 The prisoner shown as the plaintiff or petitioner on the attached order has filed a civil action in 7 forma pauperis in this court and owes to the court a filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the fee is to be paid as follows: 8 The initial partial filing fee listed on the attached order should be 9 deducted by the prison trust account office from the prisoner’s trust account and forwarded to the clerk of the court as the first installment 10 payment on the filing fee. This amount is twenty percent of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account 11 for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint/petition or (b) the average monthly balance in the 12 prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint/petition. 13 Thereafter, on a monthly basis, 20 percent of the preceding month’s 14 income credited to the prisoner’s trust account should be deducted and forwarded to the court each time the amount in the account 15 exceeds ten dollars ($10.00). The prison trust account office should continue to do this until the filing fee has been paid in full. 16 If the prisoner does not have sufficient funds in his/her account to pay the initial partial filing fee, 17 the prison trust account office should forward the available funds, and carry the balance forward each month until the amount is fully paid. 18
19 If the prisoner has filed more than one complaint, (s)he is required to pay a filing fee for each case. The trust account office should make the monthly calculations and payments for each case in 20 which it receives an order granting in forma pauperis and these instructions.
21 The prisoner’s name and case number must be noted on each remittance. The initial partial 22 filing fee is due within thirty days of the date of the attached order. Checks should be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and sent to Prisoner Accounts Receivable, U.S. District 23 Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36060, San Francisco, CA 94102.
24 cc: Plaintiff/Petitioner Finance Office 25
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Zuckerberg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-zuckerberg-cand-2024.