Johnson v. Wurster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Johnson v. Wurster

407 A.2d 54, 267 Pa. Super. 565, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2578

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 13, 1979

DocketNo. 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 407 A.2d 54 (Johnson v. Wurster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Wurster, 407 A.2d 54, 267 Pa. Super. 565, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2578 (Pa. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The lower court was correct in holding that expert testimony was necessary to the plaintiffs’ case in malpractice. See Chandler v. Cook, 438 Pa. 447, 265 A.2d 794 (1970); Freed v. Priore, 247 Pa.Super. 418, 372 A.2d 895 (1977). Since the plaintiffs proffered none, the non-suit was properly granted. Therefore we need not consider the question of the correctness of the lower court’s rulings with respect to plaintiffs’ cross-examination of the defendant and the defendant’s witness.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The lower court was correct in holding that expert testimony was necessary to the plaintiffs’ case in malpractice. See Chandler v. Cook, 438 Pa. 447, 265 A.2d 794 (1970); Freed v. Priore, 247 Pa.Super. 418, 372 A.2d 895 (1977). Since the plaintiffs proffered none, the non-suit was properly granted. Therefore we need not consider the question of the correctness of the lower court’s rulings with respect to plaintiffs’ cross-examination of the defendant and the defendant’s witness.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

407 A.2d 54, 267 Pa. Super. 565, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-wurster-pasuperct-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack