Johnson v. Williams

New York Supreme Court

Johnson v. Williams

2 Abb. Pr. 229

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Abb. Pr. 229 (Johnson v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Williams, 2 Abb. Pr. 229 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

CleeKE, J.

As more than one year has elapsed since the death of Denison Williams, the actions cannot be continued without filing a supplemental complaint as prescribed by section 121 of the Code. From the language of the same section it is evident that the permission of the court, on motion, to continue the action, must be obtained, whether the continuance of it is sought within or after the expiration of the year.

These actions are to be continued on filing a supplemental complaint. No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CleeKE, J.

As more than one year has elapsed since the death of Denison Williams, the actions cannot be continued without filing a supplemental complaint as prescribed by section 121 of the Code. From the language of the same section it is evident that the permission of the court, on motion, to continue the action, must be obtained, whether the continuance of it is sought within or after the expiration of the year.

These actions are to be continued on filing a supplemental complaint. No costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Abb. Pr. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-williams-nysupct-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack