Johnson v. Williams

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Johnson v. Williams

268 So. 2d 522, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6644

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 10, 1972

DocketNo. 4110

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 268 So. 2d 522 (Johnson v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Williams, 268 So. 2d 522, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6644 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO REMAND

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appellee Ben D. Johnson moved to remand this case so that the record could be completed. Defendant appellant Emile Williams contends that the record is complete and objects to a remand.

LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2132 provides means for the correction of the trial record after the record is lodged with the appellate court. The purpose of this article is to assure that the record on appeal is correct, irrespective of why or by whose fault it is found to be inaccurate. In all cases, the record should represent the truth.

The case is remanded so that the trial court may determine whether or not the record is complete. If it is not complete, the trial court is to order it corrected and returned to this court. If the record is complete, it is to return the record.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI