Johnson v. Wiley
This text of Johnson v. Wiley (Johnson v. Wiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7840
KENARD E. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L. WILEY, Detective, ID No. 447; SERGEANT WYNE, ID No. 740,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-05- 1865-RWT)
Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenard E. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, Assistant County Attorney, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kenard E. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Johnson v. Wiley, No. CA-05-1865-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2005). We
deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Wiley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-wiley-ca4-2006.