Johnson v. Wilcox

19 A. 939, 135 Pa. 217, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1175
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 19, 1890·No. No. 364·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The injury of which the plaintiff complains was so clearly the result of his own negligence that it was not error in the court below to direct a verdict for the defendant. The entrance to the dance-room, in Wilcox Hall, was by a lighted hall and stairway which was well known to the plaintiff. There was, therefore, a safe way to go and come, and had he followed it, he would have suffered no harm. He saw proper to leave this way and step through a door into the dark, upon a platform, under the belief that the platform was protected by a railing. In this he was unfortunately mistaken, and he fell and was injured. The owner of the platform owed him no duty of protecting it. He was going where, strictly speaking, he had no right to go, and must be taken to have assumed the risk.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Wilcox, 19 A. 939, 135 Pa. 217, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1175 (Pa. 1890).

19 A. 939 (Johnson v. Wilcox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broadaway v. King-Hunter, Inc.
73 S.E.2d 861 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Starovetsky v. Pennsylvania Railroad
195 A. 871 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
185 A. 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Savage v. Trahan Amusement Corp.
9 R.I. Dec. 132 (Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1933)
Dittus v. Johnson
12 Pa. D. & C. 132 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Boswell v. . Hosiery Mills
132 S.E. 598 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Boswell v. Whitehead Hosiery Mills
191 N.C. 549 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Silver v. Hause
131 A. 668 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.
83 S.E. 347 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Plaisance v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
136 S.W. 175 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)
Foard v. Rath
33 Pa. Super. 182 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)