Johnson v. Whitley Grocery Co.
This text of 37 S.E. 766 (Johnson v. Whitley Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Equity will, by injunction and the appointment of a receiver, defeat the consummation of a fraudulent conspiracy between an insolvent debtor and another to prevent a creditor whose claim is secured by a title to personalty from subjecting the same to the satisfaction of that claim; the more especially when by the granting of the extraordinary relief a multiplicity of suits and protracted litigation, accompanied by depreciation in the value of Hie property and consequent loss to the creditor, will be avoided.
2. In such a case the superior court of the county of the debtor’s residence has jurisdiction, although the property sought to be placed in the hands of a re[450]*450ceiver may bs located in counties of a judicial circuit other than that embracing the county first mentioned.
3. The right of a creditor thus secured to maintain, for the purpose above indicated, anequitablepetition, is not affected by the fact that, pending the same, 'the debtor was adjudged a bankrupt. Upon this point the decision of this court in Carter v. Bank, 109 Ga. 573, is in principle controlling.
4. There was no abuse of discretion in passing the order to which exception is taken. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 766, 112 Ga. 449, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-whitley-grocery-co-ga-1900.