Johnson v. West Virginia University Board of Governors

District Court, S.D. West Virginia·Decided June 7, 2023·No. 2:21-cv-00380·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-cv-00380

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 113.) By order entered on November 10, 2021, (ECF No. 60), this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission of proposed findings and recommendations for disposition (“PF&R”). On May 2, 2023, Magistrate Judge Tinsley filed a PF&R recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 166.) No objections were filed to the PF&R. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusion of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the PF&R to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal the Court’s order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989), United 1 States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). In addition, the Court need not conduct a de novo review when a party “makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate’s proposed findings and recommendations.” Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Objections to the PF&R on the pending motions were due on May 19, 2023. (ECF No. 166.) To date, no party has submitted any objections in response to the PF&R, thus constituting a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal the Court’s order. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R, (ECF No. 166), and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 113). IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: June 6, 2023 Lk. THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, CHIEF JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. West Virginia University Board of Governors, (S.D.W. Va. 2023).

Johnson v. West Virginia University Board of Governors (Johnson v. West Virginia University Board of Governors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.
727 F.2d 91 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Snyder v. Ridenour
889 F.2d 1363 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)