Johnson v. Washoe County School District

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedApril 21, 2023
Docket3:22-cv-00520
StatusUnknown

This text of Johnson v. Washoe County School District (Johnson v. Washoe County School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Washoe County School District, (D. Nev. 2023).

Opinion

1 || Sara K. Montalvo, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 11899 sara.montalvo@washoeschools.net 2 || Andrea L. Schulewitch, Esq., Nev. Bar No. 15321 andrea.schulewitch@washoeschools.net 3 || WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT P.O. Box 30425 4 || Reno, NV 89520-3425 Telephone: 775-348-0300 5 || Fax: 775-333-6010 Attorneys for Defendants Washoe County School District, 6 || Jason Urmston, Tammy Hart, Wendy Hawkins and Sean Hall 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

«88 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA oO oO © 9]! RYLEE JOHNSON, individually; and | CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-00520-LRH-CLB = SIOBHAN JOHNSON, individually; om 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING ll STIPULATED vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER eos 12 = WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a 13 political subdivision of the State of Nevada; ~ KATY UPTON, individually, and in her official 14 || capacity; JASON URMSTON, individually, and in his official capacity; TAMMY HART, 2 15 |] individually, and in her official capacity; 2 WENDY HAWKINS, individually, and in her ~ 16 || official capacity; SEAN HALL, individually, and in his official capacity; and DOES I-X, 17 Defendants. 18 / 19 20 COMES NOW, Plaintiffs: Rylee Johnson, individually, and Siobhan Johnson, 21 || individually; and Defendants: Washoe County School District, a political subdivision of the State 22 || of Nevada and current or former employees of the District Jason Urmston, Tammy Hart, Wendy 23 || Hawkins, and Sean Hall; (individually referred to as Party or collectively referred to as “Parties”), 24 || through counsel, and, in order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained

1 || by the Parties in connection with this case, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to FRCP 26(c), 2 || as follows: 3 1. Any Party or non-party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant 4 || page or as other otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that 5 || Party or non-party considers in good faith to contain information (herein referred to as 6 ||““Confidential Information”) involving: (a) employment records of any employees or former 7 employees of any Party; (b) confidential notes, memoranda, and statements regarding non-party ° 8 || employees; (c) confidential information concerning the discipline and/or termination of non-party 9 || employees and former employees; (d) the production of information or documents proprietary to 10 || any Party, including by way of example and not limitation, tax records, financial statements; (e) 11 || other private information of any Party or non-party to the present litigation, including consumer

S 12 records, e.g., phone bills; (f) financial records and business records of any person or entity, 2 13 || whether a Party or non-party to the present litigation; (g) medical records, including medical bills 14 || and psychological records, and medical information of any person, whether a Party or non-party 5 15 || to the present litigation; (h) the name, identity, record or personally identifiable information of 16 || any student or former student of Defendant Washoe County School District which information is 17 || protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. §1232g (FERPA); 18 || G) any Confidential Administrative Investigative Reports, and their related documents, conducted 19 Defendant Washoe County School District; and (k) any other personally identifiable 20 information subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law. 21 || Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on 22 || which Confidential Information appears shall be so designated. 23 2. A Party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or 24 ||in response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or on the

1 record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. 2 || Additionally, a Party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt 3 || of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific 4 || pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” information. Any 5 || other Party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the 6 || Parties shall follow the procedures described herein below. After any designation made according 7 || to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be

° 8 treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures 9 || described herein below, and counsel for all Parties shall be responsible for making all previously 10 || unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specified 11 || designation. 12 3. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than 2 13 ||information that is publicly available) shall be used by the Party or Parties to whom the 14 || information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 5 15 4. Except with the prior written consent of other Parties, or upon prior order of this 16 || Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed 17 || to any person other than: 18 a) the Parties; 19 b) counsel for the respective Parties to this litigation, including in-house 20 || counsel and co- counsel retained for this litigation; 21 c) employees of such counsel; 22 d) individual defendants, class representatives, any officer or employee of a 23 || Party, to the extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; 24 ///

] e) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of 2 || this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed 3 || to this Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the Party so disclosing the 4 || Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the 5 || pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of 6 || the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information; 7 f) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; ° 8 g) the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and 9 h) non-party witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A 10 ||non-party witness (other than persons described in paragraph 4(c) and 4(e)) shall sign the

11 || Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be

S 12 || disclosed to a non-party witness (other than persons described in paragraph 4(c) and 4(e)) who 28 13 || will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the Party who designated the 14 || Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information 5 15 shall be designated “Confidential”, as set forth herein above. Witnesses shown Confidential 16 || Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 17 5. If a Party wishes to use a document which has been marked as Confidential as an 18 || exhibit to a motion or pleading filed with the Court, the Party may do so without seeking that the 19 || entire document be filed under seal by redacting the “confidential information” from the 20 || document. 21 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson v. Washoe County School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-washoe-county-school-district-nvd-2023.