Johnson v. Ware

Supreme Court of Georgia

Johnson v. Ware

69 S.E. 481, 135 Ga. 365, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 531

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 18, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 481 (Johnson v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Ware, 69 S.E. 481, 135 Ga. 365, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 531 (Ga. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which complains of a ruling under which certain evidence was., admitted, But which fails to disclose what objection, if any, was interposed to its admissibility at [366]*366tlie time it was offered, can not be considered. Smith v. Smith, 133 Ga. 170 (3) (65 S. E. 414).

November 18, 1910.

Action, for penalty. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. December 27, 1909.

W. H. Gurr and E. T. Hickey, for plaintiff in error.

2. An attack upon a statute as unconstitutional, made for the first time in the brief of counsel in the Supreme Court, will not be considered. In this connection see Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433 (35 S. E. 681).

3. The evidence was conflicting, but sufficient to support the verdict; and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI