Johnson v. Warden

319 U.S. 763, 63 S. Ct. 1320
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 1, 1943
DocketNo. 990
StatusPublished

This text of 319 U.S. 763 (Johnson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Warden, 319 U.S. 763, 63 S. Ct. 1320 (1943).

Opinion

Petition for writ of cer[764]*764tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Johnnie Johnson, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 U.S. 763, 63 S. Ct. 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-warden-scotus-1943.