Johnson v. Warden

90 A.2d 221, 200 Md. 654
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 1, 2001
Docket[H.C. No. 1, October Term, 1952 (Adv.).]
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 A.2d 221 (Johnson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Warden, 90 A.2d 221, 200 Md. 654 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

200 Md. 654 (1952)
90 A.2d 221

JOHNSON
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[H.C. No. 1, October Term, 1952 (Adv.).]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 15, 1952.

Before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.

MARKELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for leave to appeal from denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence for four years on conviction of sale of narcotics. He alleges that he was arrested, apparently without a warrant, and without a charge against him, by breaking into his apartment, that a prosecuting witness testified that he was introduced to petitioner by an informer, who was not present at the trial, and that his counsel (of his own choosing) "at no time during the trial defended him to the full extent", without specifying any respect in which counsel failed to do so. He does not allege fraud or bad faith or collusion on the part of his counsel and any state officer. As Judge France held in his memorandum, petitioner's contentions could all have been made on motion for a new trial or on appeal and cannot be made on habeas corpus.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sykes v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
93 A.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.2d 221, 200 Md. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-warden-md-2001.