Johnson v. Virginia

101 F. App'x 421
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2004·No. No. 04-1174·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Johnson and Veronica Moody Johnson appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for emergency injunctive relief and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Virginia, No. CA-04-66-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Virginia, 101 F. App'x 421 (4th Cir. 2004).

101 F. App'x 421 (Johnson v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nickles v. O'Malley
543 U.S. 963 (Supreme Court, 2004)