Johnson v. Vannoy
This text of 605 F. App'x 183 (Johnson v. Vannoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
ON REHEARING
Robert W. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous. We previously dismissed this appeal as untimely. Johnson has now filed a petition for panel rehearing. Upon review of the petition, we grant panel rehearing and affirm.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Johnson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We also deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
605 F. App'x 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-vannoy-ca4-2015.