Johnson v. Valentine

6 Sandf. 36
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 8, 1850
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sandf. 36 (Johnson v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Valentine, 6 Sandf. 36 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).

Opinion

By the Court.

Oakley, Ch. J.

We are clearly of the opinion that the estate given to the children of T. T. Johnson, vested in interest in such of his children as were living at the death of the testator, and in his after-born children as they were born respectively. It is unnecessary for us to go into the reasons for our judgment, since they are very well expressed in the opinion of Judge Vanderpoel on deciding the case at the special term. We concur fully with him in that opinion. The interests now claimed by the plaintiif were transferred to the defendant Valentine, under the order of sale made by the court of chancery in 1824, and he has no title whatever to the premises in question. .

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Sandf. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-valentine-nysuperctnyc-1850.