Johnson v. United States
This text of Johnson v. United States (Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 BRENDA M JOHNSON, CASE NO. C21-5242 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE COMPLAINT AND GRANTING 12 v. LEAVE TO AMEND 13 UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL HEALTH, 14 DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT, CITY OF TACOMA, 15 OAH, 16 Defendants.
17 18 Plaintiff has filed a civil complaint with this court. The Court, having reviewed the 19 complaint and record, does hereby find and ORDER that the complaint is defective for the 20 following reasons: 21 (1) Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that 22 A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the 23 claim needs no new jurisdictional support; (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief sought, which 24 may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief. 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).
2 Plaintiff’s complaint does not comply with any of the requirements set forth in Rule 8(a). 3 The complaint does not set forth a plain statement of the factual allegations, the basis for the 4 Court’s jurisdiction, or the reasons Plaintiff is entitled to relief. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed 5 with this action, she must specifically identify the basis for this Court’s jurisdiction. In addition, 6 she must provide the Court with a clear statement of the factual allegations relevant to her claim, 7 and she must provide a clear and concise demand for relief. 8 (2) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint curing the above-mentioned deficiencies 9 within thirty days of the date on which this Order is signed. The amended complaint must be 10 legible and must be sufficiently clear to produce a readable scanned image. In addition, the 11 amended complaint must carry the same case number as this one. If no amended complaint is 12 timely filed, the Court will recommend that this matter be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 13 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 14 Plaintiff is advised that an amended pleading operates as a complete substitute for an
15 original pleading. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992) (citing Hal Roach 16 Studies, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1552, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990) (as amended), 17 cert. denied, 506 U.S.915 (1992). Thus, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, the 18 Court will not consider her original complaint. 19 (3) The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the appropriate forms so that she may file 20 an amended complaint. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order, and of the 21 General Order, to Plaintiff. 22 (4) Plaintiff has emailed various materials to pechmanorders@wawd.uscourts.gov, 23 which have not and will not be considered received or filed. Plaintiff is advised that any future
24 1 filings submitted in this matter must be mailed or delivered to the drop box in the lobby of the 2 courthouse in order for them to be posted to the docket. Plaintiff may also register for electronic 3 filing and file matters on the docket through the Court’s CM/ECF system. If Plaintiff wishes to 4 do so, she must complete the registration process. If Plaintiff needs assistance with completing
5 the registration process, please contact the ECF Team @ ECF Support US District Court, 6 Western Washington 206-370-8440 (choose option 2) cmecf@wawd.uscourts.gov. 7 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff and all counsel. 8 Dated June 22, 2021. A 9 10 Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-united-states-wawd-2021.