Johnson v. United States Department of Justice

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. United States Department of Justice

414 F. App'x 534

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2011·No. No. 10-7680·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barry Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action for damages pursuant to the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. 5:10-et-03002-FL, 2010 WL 4622788 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barry Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action for damages pursuant to the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. 5:10-et-03002-FL, 2010 WL 4622788 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. United States Department of Justice, 414 F. App'x 534 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

414 F. App'x 534 (Johnson v. United States Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related