Johnson v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Johnson v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 381, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1568

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1952

DocketNo. 56888; protests 41299-K, 41300-K, and 41306-K (Providence)

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 381 (Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 381, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1568 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in Mamary Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in Mamary Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Cust. Ct. 381, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-united-states-cusc-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack