Johnson v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Johnson v. United States

56 F. App'x 1

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 13, 2003·No. No. 01-5268·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed May 2 and July [2]*224, 2001, be affirmed. The court correctly held that this action is barred by res judi-cata, as appellant unsuccessfully pursued the fraudulent-inducement claim in a 1996 action.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed May 2 and July [2]*224, 2001, be affirmed. The court correctly held that this action is barred by res judi-cata, as appellant unsuccessfully pursued the fraudulent-inducement claim in a 1996 action.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Johnson v. United States, 56 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

56 F. App'x 1 (Johnson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.