Johnson v. United States
This text of 56 F. App'x 1 (Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed May 2 and July [2]*224, 2001, be affirmed. The court correctly held that this action is barred by res judi-cata, as appellant unsuccessfully pursued the fraudulent-inducement claim in a 1996 action.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-united-states-cadc-2003.