Johnson v. United States
This text of 621 F. App'x 203 (Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated cases, James Bowers Johnson, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous Johnson’s consolidated civil complaints and denying Johnson’s motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Johnson v. United States, Nos. 7:15-cv-00076-MFU-RSB; 7:15-cv-00067-MFU-RSB, 2015 WL 3949324 (W.D.Va. May 11, 2015 & May 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 F. App'x 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-united-states-ca4-2015.