Johnson v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 F. App'x 992
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2007·No. 07-1308·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1308

EUGENE W. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cv-00522-WDK)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene W. Johnson appeals the district court order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

the Government’s motion to dismiss Johnson’s civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Johnson did not

exhaust his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims

Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2675(a) (2000). See Johnson v. United States,

No. 2:05-cv-00522-WDK (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. United States, (4th Cir. 2007).

Johnson v. United States (Johnson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related