Johnson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

681 F. App'x 177
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2017
DocketNo. 16-2045
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 681 F. App'x 177 (Johnson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 681 F. App'x 177 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Khalilah Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her employer on her retaliation claim. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Johnson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, although we grant Johnson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
681 F. App'x 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca4-2017.