Johnson v. Union Marine & Fire Insurance

127 Mass. 555, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 143
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 25, 1879·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

It being admitted that, when the defendant made this policy to the plaintiffs, the billiard tables, balls and cues were kept by the plaintiffs, without license, for the purpose of playing at billiards for hire, gain or reward, in violation of the Gen. Sts. c. 88, § 70; that the intoxicating liquors were owned and kept for sale by both plaintiffs, although only one of them had a license under the St. of 1875, c. 99; and that the fixtures, furniture and pictures were used by the plaintiffs by way of furnishing and adorning the room occupied by them as a billiard saloon and as a bar-room; the case is governed by the decision of this court in Kelly v. Borne Ins. Co. 97 Mass. 288. The grounds on which that decision was placed were that the object of the assured in obtaining the policy was to make their illegal business safe and profitable, and that, the direct and immediate purpose of the contract of insurance being to protect and encourage an unlawful traffic, the contract was illegal and void, and the policy never attached. In the present case, the keeping of the billiard tables for hire and of the liquors [557] for sale being carried on as one business, and the policy being illegal as to the former at least, the whole contract is void.

Exceptions overruled.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Union Marine & Fire Insurance, 127 Mass. 555, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 143 (Mass. 1879).

127 Mass. 555 (Johnson v. Union Marine & Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strachan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
11 Mass. App. Div. 7 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1946)
Vos v. Albany Mutual Fire Insurance
253 N.W. 549 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Rabinovitz v. National Fire Insurance
155 N.E. 435 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
McMahon v. Pearlman
136 N.E. 154 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
103 S.W. 1098 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Erb v. German-American Insurance
98 Iowa 606 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Smith v. Dinkelspiel
91 Ala. 528 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Hinckley v. Germania Fire Insurance
1 N.E. 737 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Carrigan v. Lycoming Fire Insurance
53 Vt. 418 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1881)