Johnson v. Turner

498 P.2d 654, 28 Utah 2d 84, 1972 Utah LEXIS 802
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Utah 2d 439
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1972·No. Nos. 12776, 12829, 12859·Published

Opinion

ELLETT, Justice.

These three cases have been consolidated for argument on appeal. Each appellant appeals from a refusal of the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on petitions for writs of habeas corpus. In each case the appellant undertook to raise the identical issues in the habeas corpus proceeding that he had theretofore raised in his appeal to this court.

Counsel for the appellants admits that the case of Scandrett v. Turner1 squarely holds that a defendant cannot present the same issues in a habeas corpus proceeding that he had theretofore unsuccessfully raised on appeal.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in each case.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, HENRIOD, and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Turner, 498 P.2d 654, 28 Utah 2d 84, 1972 Utah LEXIS 802 (Utah 1972).

498 P.2d 654 (Johnson v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.