Johnson v. Tinsley

337 F.2d 856
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 22, 1964·No. No. 7795·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court, denying the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed for the reasons so ably expressed by the opinion of that court reported in 234 F.Supp. 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Tinsley, 337 F.2d 856 (10th Cir. 1964).

337 F.2d 856 (Johnson v. Tinsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Varner
508 P.2d 390 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1973)
Gehl v. People
423 P.2d 332 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1967)