Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct.
This text of Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct. (Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court OF NEVADA
(0) 197A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TIMOTHY HOWARD JOHNSON, No. 84163 Petitioner, Vs. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAR 11 2022 PERSHING; AND THE HONORABLE cphecn4a. Brown JIM C. SHIRLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERIC gr SUPREME COURT Respondents. 6 aoa eene ORDER DENYING PETITION This original pro se petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to take action on four motions allegedly filed. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition”). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). We reiterate that “[pJetitioner[] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.” Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). It is so ORDERED. Parraguirre ~“ pA. kaa, a. AVG 9 od. Hardesty Stiglich fee oer Rey eT ED cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Timothy Howard Johnson Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator 0) 19474 BIO
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-the-eleventh-dist-ct-nev-2022.