Johnson v. The City of New York
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAMAR JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 22 Civ. 6127 (KPF) -v.- ORDER OF SERVICE THE CITY OF NEW YORK; DENTIST JOHN DOE, Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s amended complaint filed December 12, 2022. (Dkt. #17). Further to the Court’s order on November 10, 2022 (Dkt. #16), the Clerk of Court is directed to complete the USM-285 forms with the address for Dr. Renrick Benn and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this endorsement to Plaintiff at his address of record. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2022 New York, New York
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. The City of New York (Johnson v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.