Johnson v. Taylor International Corp.

178 So. 2d 583, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2818
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 22, 1965·No. No. 34489·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 26, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve-no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essen-r tial requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

[584]*584It is further ordered that the petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees he and the same i's hereby denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Taylor International Corp., 178 So. 2d 583, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2818 (Fla. 1965).

178 So. 2d 583 (Johnson v. Taylor International Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
409 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)