Johnson v. Swart
This text of 11 Paige Ch. 385 (Johnson v. Swart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said, that if these objections to the master’s execution of the reference were valid, they should have been made before such master had heard and decided the matters pending before him upon the reference. He said a party could not lie by, and take the chance of a report in his favor, and then avail himself of an objection of this kind, when he found the report was adverse to his interest; and that it was also too late to object to the regularity of a report after the defendant had excepted to such report.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Paige Ch. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-swart-nychanct-1845.