Johnson v. SunTrust Bank

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2310

TERENCE KEITH JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUNTRUST BANK,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 07-1034

CARSEY-WERNER PRODUCTIONS, INCORPORATED; CARSEY-WERNER DISTRIBUTION, INCORPORATED; WILLIAM COSBY, “Bill”; NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; JEFFERSON-PILOT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, WWBT TV-12,

Defendants - Appellees. No. 07-1061

WAL-MART CORPORATION,

No. 07-1068

EDMUND CREEKMOORE, DOCTOR,

No. 07-1078

- 2 - versus

SUNTRUST BANK; SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED; SPOTTS FAINE, P.C.; BENJAMIN DORSEY, J.D., at Spotts Faine, P.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-1085

THOMAS V. WARREN, Judge; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

No. 07-1087

BETH GROFF, Counselor, Department of Rehabilitative Services,

- 3 - No. 07-1088

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; CITY OF PETERSBURG; LUCRETIA A. CARRICO, Judge; DONNA DILLARD; TERRI NEWMAN; PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; FLOSSIE RIDLEY; WILLIAM PARHAM; POPLAR SPRINGS HOSPITAL; SOUTHSIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; UNKNOWN CONSPIRATOR; RACHEL JOHNSON, Deceased; JAMES JOHNSON; CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL; CITY OF PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA SHERIFF; DISTRICT 19 COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD; ASAAD MASRI, Doctor; DR.; DEBORAH HIGGINBOTHAM, LCSW; MARSHA ANDREWS, Counselor; DELANO PARHAM; CALVIN H. THIGPEN, J.D., M.D.; CITY OF RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT; RICHMOND BEHAVIOR; INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES; ROBERT KLEIN; IN KLEIN, Judge; PORTSMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT,

No. 07-1089

- 4 - versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES EMBASSY, SENEGAL,

No. 07-1092

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; THE CITY OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS, VIRGINIA; CITY OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT; RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL,

No. 07-1093

SOUTHSIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,

- 5 - No. 07-1094

CALVIN H. THIGPEN,

No. 07-1095

HOFFMAN COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, WROU 1240 AM “Talk Back Live”,

No. 07-1096

- 6 - HAULERS INSURANCE COMPANY, INCORPORATED; PATRICK WOLFORD; COLONIAL HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge; Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00748- HEH; 3:07-cv-00004;3:06-cv-00804-JRS; 3:06-cv-00811-JRS; 3:07-cv- 00001-JRS; 3:07-cv-00003-JRS; 3:06-cv-00826-JRS; 3:06-cv-00846-JRS; 3:06-cv-00866-JRS; 3:06-cv-00805-JRS; 3:06-cv-00816-JRS; 3:06-cv- 00827-JRS; 3:06-cv-00847-JRS; 3:06-cv-00867-JRS)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER,* and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terence Keith Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Frances Hardy, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee Edmund Creekmoore.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* Judge Traxler did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

- 7 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Terence Keith Johnson

seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous

his civil complaints raising a host of claims against numerous

defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant Johnson’s motions to amend

his informal briefs, we deny his motion to file an amended

complaint in No. 06-2310 and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Johnson v. SunTrust Bank, Nos. 3:06-cv-00748-HEH;

3:07-cv-00001-JRS (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2006 & Jan. 8, 2007);

Johnson v. Carsey-Warner Prod., No. 3:07-cv-00004 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8,

2007); Johnson v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 3:06-cv-00804-JRS (E.D. Va.

Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Creekmoore, No. 3:06-cv-00811-JRS (E.D.

Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Warren, No. 3:07-cv-00003-JRS (E.D.

Va. Jan. 8, 2007); Johnson v. Groff, No. 3:06-cv-00826-JRS (E.D.

Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Commonwealth of Va., Nos. 3:06-cv-

00846-JRS & 3:06-cv-00805-JRS (E.D. Va. Jan. 5 & 8, 2007);

Johnson v. United States, No. 3:06-cv-00866-JRS (E.D. Va. Jan. 9,

2007); Johnson v. Southside Reg’l Med. Ctr., No. 3:06-cv-00816-JRS

(E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2007); Johnson v. Thigpen, No. 3:06-cv-00827-JRS

(E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2006); Johnson v. Hoffman Commc’ns, Inc., No.

3:06-cv-00847-JRS (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2007); Johnson v. Haulers Ins.

Co., No. 3:06-cv-00867-JRS (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

- 8 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 9 -