Johnson v. Stone Container Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Stone Container Corp.

53 F. App'x 248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 19, 2002

DocketNo. 02-1602

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F. App'x 248 (Johnson v. Stone Container Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Stone Container Corp., 53 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Stone Container Corp., No. CA-00-3714 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Steven D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Stone Container Corp., No. CA-00-3714 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-stone-container-corp-ca4-2002.