Johnson v. Stone Container Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Stone Container Corp.

53 F. App'x 248

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2002·No. No. 02-1602·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Stone Container Corp., No. CA-00-3714 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Steven D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Stone Container Corp., No. CA-00-3714 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Stone Container Corp., 53 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

53 F. App'x 248 (Johnson v. Stone Container Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.