Johnson v. Stewart
40 Ga. 167
Opinion
There was no motion made before the Judge to dissolve the injunction upon notice to the opposite party, as required by the 3151st section of the Code. The .granting of the ex parte order by the Judge for an injunction was not such a judgment, decision or decree of a Judge, heard at Chambers, as entitles the defendant to except to the same, and bring it before this Court by writ of error, under the provisions of the 4192d section of the Code.
Let the writ of error be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Stewart, 40 Ga. 167 (Ga. 1869).
40 Ga. 167 (Johnson v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Temple Baptist Church v. Georgia Terminal Co.
58 S.E. 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Smith v. Willis
33 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Sparks v. Maxwell
41 Ga. 421 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1870)