Johnson v. Stein Mart, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Johnson v. Stein Mart, Inc.

276 F. App'x 931

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 5, 2008·No. No. 07-13338·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the record, the briefs of the parties, and having heard oral argument, we VACATE and REMAND to allow the district court to complete the record. The district court should be guided by our prior decision in Snook v. Trust Co. of Ga. Bank of Savannah, N.A., 859 F.2d 865 (11th Cir.1988). Appellant’s Motion to Certify Question to Florida Supreme Court is therefore DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the record, the briefs of the parties, and having heard oral argument, we VACATE and REMAND to allow the district court to complete the record. The district court should be guided by our prior decision in Snook v. Trust Co. of Ga. Bank of Savannah, N.A., 859 F.2d 865 (11th Cir.1988). Appellant’s Motion to Certify Question to Florida Supreme Court is therefore DENIED.

Johnson v. Stein Mart, Inc., 276 F. App'x 931 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

276 F. App'x 931 (Johnson v. Stein Mart, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related