Johnson v. Stein Mart, Inc.
This text of 276 F. App'x 931 (Johnson v. Stein Mart, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having carefully considered the record, the briefs of the parties, and having heard oral argument, we VACATE and REMAND to allow the district court to complete the record. The district court should be guided by our prior decision in Snook v. Trust Co. of Ga. Bank of Savannah, N.A., 859 F.2d 865 (11th Cir.1988). Appellant’s Motion to Certify Question to Florida Supreme Court is therefore DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 F. App'x 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-stein-mart-inc-ca11-2008.