Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee, No. Cv 563689 (Nov. 26, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee, No. Cv 563689 (Nov. 26, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 10134

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 26, 1996·No. No. CV 563689·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS The Motion to Dismiss the Verified Complaint seeking a temporary and permanent injunction is granted.

The plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and he has adequate remedies at law.

Plaintiff's reference to Doe v. Statewide GrievanceCommittee, 41 Conn. App. 671 (1996) is inapplicable since the Committee referred the matter to the Review Committee within 120 days of the reference by the Panel to the Committee. The Doe case points out that section 51-90g(c) controls the subcommittee action and is not jurisdictional.

The plaintiff's action is more in the nature of an appeal from an interlocutory ruling and is premature. He has adequate rights of appeal from any future action by the subcommittee and/or the committee.

In the opinion of this court jurisdiction to hear the motion attached when the Verified Complaint was filed in court.

Hale, Judge Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS The Motion to Dismiss the Verified Complaint seeking a temporary and permanent injunction is granted.

The plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and he has adequate remedies at law.

Plaintiff's reference to Doe v. Statewide GrievanceCommittee, 41 Conn. App. 671 (1996) is inapplicable since the Committee referred the matter to the Review Committee within 120 days of the reference by the Panel to the Committee. The Doe case points out that section 51-90g(c) controls the subcommittee action and is not jurisdictional.

The plaintiff's action is more in the nature of an appeal from an interlocutory ruling and is premature. He has adequate rights of appeal from any future action by the subcommittee and/or the committee.

In the opinion of this court jurisdiction to hear the motion attached when the Verified Complaint was filed in court.

Hale, Judge Trial Referee

Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee, No. Cv 563689 (Nov. 26, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 10134 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 10134 (Johnson v. Statewide Grievance Committee, No. Cv 563689 (Nov. 26, 1996)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related