Johnson v. State
172 Tex. Crim. 624
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 3, 1961
DocketNo. 33,266
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases
This text of 172 Tex. Crim. 624 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 172 Tex. Crim. 624 (Tex. 1961).
Opinions
dissenting.
I do not agree that the trial court’s failure to adjudicate and determine whether any remission should be made, under the provisions of Art. 439 C.C.P., authorizes this court to effect a remission of a part of the amount of the judgment appealed from. Reference is made to my dissent in Ricard et al v. State, No. 33,297, this day decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tom Benson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
McKenna v. State
209 S.W.3d 233 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Mike McKenna D/B/A Bondman Bail Bonds v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006
Gramercy Insurance Co. v. State
834 S.W.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Smith v. State
566 S.W.2d 638 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Hollins v. State
427 S.W.2d 865 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Bowen v. State
413 S.W.2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Gibson v. State
401 S.W.2d 822 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 Tex. Crim. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-texcrimapp-1961.