Johnson v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 Tex. Crim. 289
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 14, 1960·No. No. 32,563·Published

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture proceedings appealed from the County Court at Law of McLennan County.

The state has filed a motion in this court praying that we not consider the statement of facts herein because the same was not filed in the trial court within the 50 days provided by Rule 381, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. No motion was made in the trial court to extend the time for filing the same. The state further points out that the statement of facts was not approved by a representative of the state. Reliance is had upon Gonzales v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 266 S. W. 2d 233, 267 S. W. 2d 587, and 274 S. W. 2d 537, which support the state’s contention.

The motion is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 462 (Tex. 1960).

170 Tex. Crim. 462 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
274 S.W.2d 537 (Texas Supreme Court, 1955)
Gonzalez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
267 S.W.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)