Johnson v. State

98 S.W.2d 187

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Tex. Crim. 356 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 1936·No. No. 18545·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of negligent homicide, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a-period of six months.

[188]*188The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the information or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of negligent homicide, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a-period of six months.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Johnson v. State, 98 S.W.2d 187 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

98 S.W.2d 187 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.