Johnson v. State

60 S.W.2d 236, 124 Tex. Crim. 29, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 332
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Tex. Crim. 103
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 15, 1933·No. No. 15638·Published

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Appellants were jointly tried and [30]*30convicted of fornication. The punishment of appellant, Edna Alline Johnson, was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and that of appellant, Herschel Saunders at a fine of one hundred dollars.

It is recited in the recognizance that appellants have been convicted of the offense of adultery and fornication. It appears from the record that appellants were convicted of fornication. Hence the designation of the offense in the recognizance is incorrect.

Appellants entered into a joint recognizance. A joint recognizance on appeal will not confer jurisdiction on this court. Our decisions are to the effect that each appellant must give a separate recognizance. Jackson et al. v. State, 21 S. W. (2d) 298, and authorities cited.

Appellants are granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect their appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 60 S.W.2d 236, 124 Tex. Crim. 29, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 332 (Tex. 1933).

60 S.W.2d 236 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.