Johnson v. State

294 S.W. 588, 107 Tex. Crim. 3, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 286
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Tex. Crim. 417
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 4, 1927·No. No. 10884.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The evidence is definite to the point that the appellant was transporting whiskey in an automobile.

There are no bills of exceptions complaining of the introduction of testimony. The evidence having been received without objection, the complaint that the officers searched the appellant’s car without a warrant is not tenable. To justify consideration on appeal of the receipt of evidence on the trial, objection and exception at that time and presentation by bill of exceptions is essential.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 294 S.W. 588, 107 Tex. Crim. 3, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 286 (Tex. 1927).

294 S.W. 588 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.